Every vote here is cryptographically proof-logged.
Anyone can verify it, anytime.
Want the full revenue and impact model? See /transparency →
What you’re looking at
Every vote ever cast on GreenSweep gets written to a tamper-evident chain of receipts. Each new receipt is mathematically linked to the one before it, so changing any earlier vote would break the chain for everyone after \u2014 and the break is detectable in seconds.
You don’t have to trust us. Any third party can re-derive the same chain from the public ledger and detect tampering on their own machine. That’s what the widget above is doing right now, live, on a server you don’t control.
Why does this proof matter?
Because the model behind it commits 85\u201396% of revenue to projects. Read the full model on /transparency →
Today’s signed export
Prefer to verify offline? We publish a signed daily snapshot of the chain that you can download and re-derive yourself.
Common questions
What’s the difference between /proof and /transparency?
/proof answers a technical question: is the chain real? It shows the live verifier and lets anyone re-derive the receipts.
/transparency answers a business question: where does the money come from and where does it go? It documents the full revenue and allocation model.
Who can verify?
Anyone. The verifier is a public endpoint; the daily signed export is a public download. Researchers, journalists, partner foundations, and curious voters all use the same surface.
What if a vote is missing?
The verifier reports the exact receipt where the chain breaks. That’s your proof. If you ever see a non-verified result here, take a screenshot and contact us \u2014 the same evidence is available to every other observer simultaneously.
Built on proof, not promises.